McGraw, Justice, dissenting:
It is clear that Rule 15 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure provides
that a party may amend a pleading by leave of the court and “leave shall be freely given when
justice so requires.” W. Va. R. Civ. P. 15 (2003). The Rules favor the resolution of claims
rather than their exclusion. As this Court has often noted “[i]t is well established that
complaints are to be read liberally as required by the notice pleading theory underlying the
West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure.'” Whorton v. Malone, 209 W. Va. 384, 390 n.6, 549
S.E.2d 57, 63 n.6 (2001); accord, State ex rel. McGraw v. Scott Runyan Pontiac-Buick, Inc.,
194 W. Va. 770, 461 S.E.2d 516 (1995); Mandolidis v. Elkins Indus., Inc., 161 W. Va. 695,
246 S.E.2d 907 (1978); John W. Lodge Distrib. Co., Inc. v. Texaco, Inc., 161 W. Va. 603,
245 S.E.2d 157 (1978). In light of this authority, I believe that the lower court was correct
in allowing St. James to amend its complaint. Therefore, I must respectfully dissent.