| 1. |
Parrish McKittrick No. 000279 accept (response within 5 days) |
Petition for a Writ of Prohibition in SER Jimmie Ray v. Honorable Herman Canady, No. 000279 seeking to prohibit enforcement of an order dated January 3, 2000 requiring Jimmie Ray to “pay and transfer to the plaintiff, FORTHWITH, as lump sum to be considered temporary alimony, and to be considered as a credit on behalf of the defendant against the sum previously designed by the Family Law Master herein as temporary alimony, and further to be considered a credit against any final award of alimony, the sum of sixty-two thousand five hundred dollars ($62,500.00).” |
| 2. |
John R. Anderson No. 000330 Refuse 5-0 |
Petition for Bail Pending Appeal in State v. Mathew D. Cochran, No. 000330. Cochran was convicted by a jury in magistrate court of brandishing and obstructing. He was sentenced to six months in jail and a $50 fine on each conviction to run consecutively. The circuit court (Judge Karl) affirmed the convictions. The circuit court denied the motion for bail because the offenses were committed with a firearm. Cochran's principal claim on appeal to this Court will be that his conduct is core conduct protected by the Right to Bear Arms Amendment and by free speech guarantees. The State opposes bail. |
| 3. |
Ancil G. Ramey No. 000343 Grant 5-0 |
Petition for a Writ of Prohibition in SER Brenda Bolden v. Honorable David M. Pancake, No. 000343. Petitioner seeks issuance of a rule in prohibition to prevent any further action in the underlying proceeding which she argues should have been dismissed for failure to timely serve the complaint. It is stated that the complaint was not served within 120 days of filing but rather 211 days even though there were 2 documents that identified Bolden's physical address. The underlying action is one for personal injuries arising out of a motor vehicle accident. It is further asserted that the matter should have been dismissed with prejudice due to the statute of limitations. |
| 4. |
William Cassel Pulliam No. 26959 Refuse 5-0 |
Appellee's Motion to Dismiss Appeal in Mark D. Adams v. W.C.D. & Williams Constr. Co., No.26959. Appellee argues that the appeal is moot because jurisdiction over the matter has been exercised pending the outcome of the appeal and a factual determination made which is no longer subject to appeal in that an Order was entered on 11-15-99 which has not been appealed. |
| 5. |
Thomas L. Craig No. 27311 Refuse 5-0 |
Motion on Behalf of Nurse Respondent to Proceed with Appeal Anonymously in Olma Mae Taylor v. Cabell Huntington Hospital, No. 27311. The nurse seeks to have her name removed from the style of the case as well as all court documents, opinions, etc. |
| 6. |
Charles R. Webb No. 000329 Grant 3-2 (Davis, J., Scott, J.) |
Petition for a Writ of Prohibition in SER David Adkins v. Honorable Eric O'Briant, No. 000329. Petitioner requests a rule to show cause why the order of 2-1-00 staying the execution of the temporary order of the FLM should stand. This matter involves custody of a three-year-old child. Response in opposition. |
| 7. |
Steven L. Miller No. 26735 Refuse 5-0 |
Appellant's Motion to Reconsider Dismissal in Virgil J. Kirk v. Franklin Mullins, No. 26735. This Court granted the Motions of Appellees to Dismiss on January 26, 2000. The Appellees argued that the appeal was not timely and that they had not been served with the petition. Affidavits of counsel were attached. Kirk asks the Court to reconsider. It is argued that the appeal was timely and was properly served. There are employee affidavits regarding service. |