1.  William Wayne Repass v. WCD and USX Corporation/U. S. Steel Mining Co., Inc. - 27730 - No summary available.

2.   Randall Z. Bower v. WCD and Maple Meadow Mining Company - 28392 - No summary available.

3.   Angela Frye v. Future Inns of America-Huntington, Inc., et al. - 30091 - West Virginia Human Rights Commission seeks to appeal lower court's assessment of maximum amount of incidental damages on a per case basis rather than per respondent.

4.   David M. Ross v. Heidi S. Ross - 30093 - Father appeals circuit court's order denying his exceptions to the Family Law Master's ruling that Alaska has proper jurisdiction over this custody action involving the parties' four year old daughter. Father argues that West Virginia has jurisdiction over the custody issue. - Rescheduled to Wednesday, May 1, 2002.

5.  Sandra K. Hicks, Adm’x v. David A. Ghaphery, M.D., et al.  - 30088 - The petitioner, Sandra K. Hicks, Administratrix, appeals from orders  granting the motion of respondent Wheeling Hospital for summary judgment and denying the petitioner's motion for a new trial with regard to respondent David A. Ghaphery, M.D. The petitioner's decedent died as the result of an accident in which the decedent's motorcycle was struck by another vehicle. The jury determined that the petitioner was entitled to damages from the driver of the other vehicle.  The petitioner contends that the respondent hospital and physician, who treated the decedent immediately after the accident, were also responsible for the decedent's death. The petitioner, therefore, asserts that, as to those respondents, the summary judgment was entered in error and the petitioner was entitled to a new trial.

6.   Becky L. Goundry v. Sara Wetzel-Saffle, D.O., et al.  - 30092 - Goundry appeals the circuit court order granting summary judgement in favor of the defendant, Wetzel-Saffle, in Goundry's civil action seeking damages based on Defendant's negligence in failing to diagnose and treat Goundry's pregnancy. Goundry claims that the court below erred in finding that because the plaintiff did not have an expert to establish the standard of care, then she had failed to establish a prima facie case of professional liability.

7.   SER Brittany N., etc. v. Hon. Jack Alsop, Judge, et al.  - 30113 - Dismissed.

8.  SER Dana December Smith v. Hon. Herman G. Canady, Jr., Judge  - 30095 - Dismissed.

9.  SER Samuel P. Moore v. Hon. E. Lee Schlaegel, Jr., Judge  - 30096 - Dismissed.

10. Samuel R. O’Dell, et al. v. Gary W. Miller, M.D., et al.  - 29776 - Medical malpractice plaintiff seeks to appeal a jury verdict finding defendants liable for breach of standard of care but no proximate cause as to damages.