Link to original WordPerfect Document here
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST
VIRGINIA
September 1997 Term
___________
No. 24473
___________
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA ex rel.,
SERGEANT T. A. BARRICK,
WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, a government agency,
Petitioners,
v.
HONORABLE ROBERT B. STONE,
Judge of the Circuit Court of Monongalia County, and
R.E.P.,
Respondents.
________________________________________________________
Writ of Prohibition
WRIT GRANTED
________________________________________________________
Submitted: November 4, 1997
Filed: December 11, 1997
Darrell V. McGraw, Jr.,
Esq. Lonnie
C. Simmons, Esq.
Attorney
General DiTrapano
& Jackson
Dolores A. Martin,
Esq. Charleston,
West Virginia
Assistant Attorney
General Attorney
for Respondent
Charleston, West
Virginia
Honorable Robert B. Stone
Attorneys for
Petitioners
Rose Marie Esposito, Esq.
WVU Student Legal Services
Morgantown, West Virginia
Counsel for Respondent R.E.P.
JUSTICE STARCHER delivered the Opinion of the Court.
SYLLABUS
1. A circuit court, absent extraordinary circumstances and to protect constitutional rights or some other compelling public policy imperative, does not in the absence of statutory authority have the power to order the expungement of criminal history record information regarding a valid criminal conviction maintained by the State Police Criminal Investigation Bureau pursuant to W.Va. Code, 15-2-24 [1977].
Starcher, J.:
In this case we
hold that a circuit court erred in requiring the West Virginia
State Police's Criminal Investigation Bureau ("CIB") to
partially expunge criminal history record information regarding
an individual.
I.
Facts & Background
The petitioners,
the West Virginia State Police ("State Police") and
Sergeant Barrick, head of the CIB, invoke the original
jurisdiction of this Court by a writ of prohibition to prevent
the enforcement of an order entered by the respondent, the
Honorable Robert B. Stone, Judge of the Circuit Court of
Monongalia County, West Virginia, requiring the CIB to partially
expunge criminal history record information regarding the
respondent R.E.P. (We refer to R.E.P. by his initials at his
request and in keeping with our practice involving sensitive
issues where the disclosure of a name is not appropriate.)
As we recently
discussed in State ex rel. State Police v. Taylor, ___
W.Va. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, No. 24150, November 20, 1997, the CIB
serves as a central depository for the storage of fingerprints
and other records of persons arrested or detained by law
enforcement officers. The CIB is established pursuant to W.Va.
Code, 15-2-24 [1977].
On September 13,
1994, R.E.P. was arrested by the Morgantown City Police
Department and charged with the crime of shoplifting. On November
3, 1994, R.E.P. entered a plea of guilty in the Municipal Court
of the City of Morgantown, West Virginia, to the charge of
shoplifting, and paid a fine. On June 3, 1997, the respondent
Judge Stone,
pursuant to a Petition for Expungement filed on
behalf of R.E.P. issued an order which in part directed:
[T]he Criminal
Investigation Bureau of the West Virginia Department of Public
Safety [to] expunge and therefore consider null and void for
purposes of professional licensing, as well as for purposes of
employment application and record, all handprints, thumbprints,
mug shots, and all other records - computer and otherwise - of
Petitioner's arrest and conviction.See footnote 1 1
We need not
decide in the instant case whether, as respondent R.E.P.
contends, a circuit court has the power to enter an order,
pursuant to its inherent authority to enter such orders as
justice requires in connection with its core functions, and/or
pursuant to the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, W.Va. Code,
55-13-1 to -16, to the effect that an otherwise valid criminal
conviction obtained within the court's jurisdiction for a minor
nonviolent offense should be regarded as null and void for
employment or licensing purposes.
However, assuming
such a power arguendo, it can in no wise be construed to
extend to ordering the petitioners to expunge criminal history
record information.See
footnote 2 2 No statute or constitutional precept
operates to require us to find that expungement by a court order
is
authorized in these circumstances, and we are
cited to no authority for such a power from other jurisdictions.
Consequently, we
find that a circuit court, absent extraordinary circumstances and
to protect constitutional rights or some other compelling public
policy imperative, does not in the absence of statutory authority
have the power to order the expungement of criminal history
record information regarding a valid criminal conviction
maintained by the State Police Criminal Investigation Bureau
pursuant to W.Va. Code, 15-2-24 [1977].
Therefore,
the circuit court's order, no matter how well motivated, was
erroneous. The writ of prohibition is granted.
Granted.
Footnote:
1 1
The order stated, in pertinent part:
The Court recognizes that [R.E.P.] has successfully continued
with his studies at West Virginia University, and has graduated
with plans to pursue a career in teaching.
The Court is of
the opinion that it is unable to completely grant the
petitioner's request. However, recognizing the petitioner's
accomplishments and pursuits, the Court is also of the opinion
that it would be unfortunate if the petitioner were prevented
from continuing with his goals. Accordingly, the Court does
hereby
ORDER that the
relief requested should be denied in part. However, the Court
does further
ORDER that the
petitioner shall be entitled to hereafter have his criminal
record expunged and therefore considered to be null and void for
all professional licensing purposes, as well as all employment
application and record purposes. It is further
ORDERED that the
Clerk of the Morgantown Municipal Court and the Clerk of the
Records of the Morgantown City Police shall expunge and therefore
consider null and void for purposes of professional licensing, as
well as for purposes of employment application and record, all
records of petitioner's arrest and conviction filed under City of
Morgantown v. [R.E.P.] It is further
ORDERED that the
Criminal Investigation Bureau of the West Virginia Department of
Public Safety shall expunge and therefore consider null and void
for purposes of professional licensing, as well as for purposes
of employment application
and record, all handprints, thumbprints, mug
shots, and all other records - computer and otherwise - of
petitioner's arrest and conviction.
Thereupon,
petitioner presented his petition for expungement and the Court,
upon review of the petition and upon consideration of the
arguments of counsel, and there being no objection by the City of
Morgantown, realizes the implications presented by a criminal
record, however, there is no common law or statutory basis in the
State of West Virginia for total expungement of a record for this
type of misdemeanor. Thus, the Court is without the authority to
completely expunge the record of this young man, but it is only
because of the lack of statutory or common law authority that it
fails to do so.
Footnote: 2 2 W.Va. Code, 15-2-25 [1977], using the word "may" in all instances where it discusses the release of criminal history record information, thereby grants CIB discretion in the release of information.